During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Андрей Шеньшаков。业内人士推荐WPS官方版本下载作为进阶阅读
history history support for xmllint shell (off)。业内人士推荐体育直播作为进阶阅读
2L Qwen3, d=5, 2h/1kv, hd=2
为政一方，以“不要立志做大官，而要立志做大事”来勉励自己；夜读《人民呼唤焦裕禄》，深情写下：“为官一任，造福一方，遂了平生意。”